Space-time limitation of the static enlightenment!

There is a basic difference between the static philosophy and moving philosophy, static God and moving God, static science and moving science, and static tradition and moving tradition. Basavanna says, “There is destruction for what stands but not for that which moves”. Whenever nature gives birth to new wonders in the world within science, religion, tradition and others, it represents a moving character. Yet, this moving character will not last for a long time because of our static way of thinking. Whenever new research has emerged in the history of humanity, it has maintained moving character in the beginning but slowly lost the beauty of the moving character because of our minds’ orthodox interaction. Nevertheless, the transformation of moving character to static character occurs only in the human mind, not in nature. In the western world, there is now a spiritual madness to dig out all the static philosophies of ancient history. Some are talking about Tantra, some are talking about Yoga, some are talking about Vastu, and some are talking about mediation and so forth. In fact, they are searching for the static shelter to compensate or to define their own lethargic way of life. Our ancient Sages, Buddha, Krishna, Jesus, Rama, Prophet and other prominent spiritual personalities emerged with moving philosophy, not with a static one. But who made it static? Ask yourself! Which philosophy, science, religion, culture, god and tradition are you representing? Is it a static one or a moving one? Vivekananda says, “Faith is not a belief; it is the grasp of the ultimate as illumination”.